Health insurance system for hematologic diseases: what should we do?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) was introduced in 1963 and became a nationwide health insurance after several law reforms in 1988. As a result of nationalization, coverage has expanded, and its service level has greatly improved since 1998 [1]. However, several diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for rare, incurable diseases such as malignant hematologic diseases are excluded from the reimbursement criteria, and this often complicates physicians’ decision making in terms of evidence-based guidelines. The diagnosis and treatment of hematologic diseases have been rapidly advancing in recent years. However, NHI policy limitations hinder the addition of these advances to standard practice guidelines. Furthermore, the system’s current principle of basic equal sharing regardless of disease severity will inevitably lead to a budget deficit. In this article, we aim to illuminate the insurance problems that arise in the treatment of hematologic diseases under the current NHI and propose solutions to these problems.
منابع مشابه
Meeting the Challenge of Diabetes in China
China’s estimated 114 million people with diabetes pose a massive challenge for China’s health policy-makers who have significantly extended health insurance coverage over the past decade. What China is doing now, what it has achieved, and what remains to be done should be of interest to health policy-makers, worldwide. We identify the challenges posed by China’s two pr...
متن کاملIt Ain’t What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
Mannion and Braithwaite outline a new paradigm for studying and improving patient safety – Safety II. In this response, I argue that Safety I should not be dismissed simply because the safety management strategies that are developed and enacted in the name of Safety I are not always true to the original philosophy of ‘systems thinking.’
متن کاملResponsibilising Managers and Clinicians, Neglecting System Health? What Kind of Healthcare Leadership Development Do We Want?; Comment on “Leadership and Leadership Development in Healthcare Settings - A Simplistic Solution to Complex Problems?”
Responding to Ruth McDonald’s editorial on the rise of leadership and leadership development programmes in healthcare, this paper offers three arguments. Firstly, care is needed in evaluating impact of leadership development, since achievement of organisational goals is not necessarily an appropriate measure of good leadership. Secondly, the proliferation of styles of leadership might be unders...
متن کاملEnvironmental ethics and Corona Virus
Environmental ethics and Corona Virus Abstract Corona Virus pandemic outbreak is the counter act and warning of the natural environment for the destructive activities of man in the nature. Many researchers and specialists believe that a risk free and sustainable life is possible if we correct our behavior toward the nature. This research was carried out to substantiate this hypothesis and...
متن کاملNurturing Societal Values in and Through Health Innovations; Comment on “What Health System Challenges Should Responsible Innovation in Health Address?”
Aligning innovation processes in healthcare with health system demands is a societal objective, not always achieved. In line with earlier contributions, Lehoux et al outline priorities for research, public communication, and policy action to achieve this objective. We endorse setting these priorities, while also highlighting a ‘commitment gap’ in collectively addressing system-level challenges....
متن کامل